Tuesday, 19 July 2016

Shekpendeh Newspaper Is Born



Editorial Comment

Who We Are!!!

The word 'Shekpendeh' refers to the eagle in the Kono, Sherbro and Mende local parlance. The eagle is on record as having perhaps the best sight amongst birds worldwide, with a capacity to spot objects from a thousand kilometers or even more.
Shekpendeh Newspaper is designed therefore to give premium to investigative -exploratory journalism and human rights reporting, as well as promoting the tenets of media for peace.

The main aim of Shekpendeh Newspaper is to serve as the official mouthpiece of the wider civil society body in the country and to join other media houses in the advocacy for good governance, adherence to the principles of the rule of Law, respect for human rights and a violent free society where love for each other abounds.

Countless number of human right interest stories are lying dead waiting to be woken up. Justice for the aggrieved however delayed is crucial if only to consolidate the negative peace the country currently enjoys after an eleven years civil war that left thousands killed, thousands including innocent women and children  heartlessly amputated or indecently assaulted, and thousands more left either physically or psychologically displaced.

Against the backdrop that there can be no peace without justice, it suits us as journalists to do what we can to restore the happiness of aggrieved persons in society, using the media as an effective tool for achieving that.
It is our belief that Sierra Leone is at crossroads. It is also our belief that all is not lost if only we can all resolve to put things right and make the country the paradise it was destined to be.

The media has a great role to play in this drive. It goes without saying that nothing succeeds in practical terms in Sierra Leone presently without the use of the media.
Neither the government nor stakeholders in politics, civil service, diplomatic circles and civil society get through to the general masses without the media. The effective use of the media is therefore very crucial for the peaceful cohesion and development of the nation.

The media is thriving in Sierra Leone, thanks to the relative press freedom enjoyed by journalists, despite the maintenance of the seditious and libel laws in our law books, deemed to be repressive.

Shekpendeh Newspaper is coming at a time when the country is experiencing an impressive media revolution. This is evident by the number of newspapers, radio stations and television stations currently in operation. Standard Times Newspaper and the African Young Voices for instance can now boast of running media empires consisting of a newspaper, radio, television and a printing press, while most newspapers like AWOKO, Premier Media, Global Times, Salone Times and Concord Times to name a few, have gone coloured and some equipped with their own private printing facilities. 

Coming from the civil society and human rights angle, Shekpendeh Newspaper's editorial standpoint will differ significantly from a number of other media houses. 
We shall be biased in the best interest of the general masses and the country as a whole, while at the same time maintain a high level of objectivity and development journalism.

We shall cover events carried out by all sectors of society including government, political parties, civil society organizations, workers, students, teachers and lecturers and so on, and shall create as many partnerships as possible. This is so because we believe in achieving common objectives collectively.

Shekpendeh Newspaper will operate as a registered non-governmental and non-partisan media organization and shall dedicate lot of time and space to human interest stories as well as conducting training sessions for journalists and community people on various thematic issues.

We are here to serve and to stay. Please join us to make our objectives met. 

Land Conference Report courtest of Shekpendeh Newspaper



Culture Radio/Green Scenery End National Land Conference 

By Theophilus Sahr Gbenda and Ilyasa Baa 

With support from Bread for the World and Welt Hunger Hilfe, Culture Radio FM 104.5 and Green Scenery, have ended a three-day national land governance conference, held Monday 11th – Wednesday 13th July 2016 at the Sierra Leone Police officers Mess in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Under the theme ‘Our Land – Our Right – Our Responsibility’, the conference which brought together civil society organizations working on land rights, print and electronic journalists, landowners as well as land users from across the country, aimed at highlighting the gaps in land deals with multinational companies investing in agriculture and how a win-win situation can be achieved so as to avoid imminent conflicts.

At the opening ceremony witnessed by distinguished personalities from government line ministries such as the Ministry of Land Country Planning and the Environment, security forces including the police and army, international non-governmental organizations, donor agencies and the German Embassy in Freetown, statements aimed at dilating on the complexities and realities surrounding large scale and long term land acquisition by multinational companies, were made.

Research based power point presentations on key thematic issues such as the current land situation in the country as it relates to international investments in land, the possibilities and challenges of the Voluntary Guidelines for the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the context of national food security (VGGT) and the current status of the legal reform process around land – the new National Land Policy, the chapter on land in the abridged version of the constitutional review process and road ahead of implementation, were also made.

In his statement, Dr. Alphajoh Cham representing the Ministry of Land Country Planning and the Environment, spoke about the land tenure system and governance in Sierra Leone, pointing out that existing challenges range from inequitable land access and large-scale land acquisition to lack of geo-spatial and cadastral information system, conflicting interests on land use for public and private purposes, and corruption.

Dr. Cham said the relevance of the new National Land Policy is anchored on the fact it is a national priority under Pillar 2 of the Agenda for Prosperity 2013-2018, strategy 7.3 under the Post-Ebola Recovery Plan, and it also in tandem with goals 15, 11, 5, 2 and 1 under the Sustainable Development Goals (zero hunger, gender equality, sustainable cities, poverty eradication etc.).

The specific objectives of the policy, among other things, he said, is to promote land law reforms, ensure tenure security and protect land rights, promote equitable access, promote sound land use planning and development, decentralize land administration and reduce/eradicate land disputes and/or conflicts.

In his statement representing civil society organizations working around land rights issues, Executive Director of Sustainable Environment and Development Association (SEDA) Bun Wai, said, the country’s land tenure system is burdened with major challenges of poor governance and inequitable distribution.

He noted that the assumption by government and local authorities that investors are indispensable in achieving national economic development has greatly undermined the rights of ordinary people to own land, stressing that government is constantly transferring ownership of land from poor families to so-called investors through unfair deals that are not predicated on free, prior and informed consent.

Injustice in the land sector, Mr. Bun Wai who happens to be the Acting Coordinator of the Action for Large Scale Land Acquisition Transparency (ALLAT) said, could be a recipe for conflict and political unrest, unless the right steps are taken to right the situation.

Muniru Koroma representing the Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) on the special chapter on land in the upcoming new constitution of the Republic of Sierra Leone explained that the abridged version of the new constitution recommends the maintenance of the two tier land tenure system and the removal of all forms of discrimination on land ownership in the country.

He said to protect citizens’ land rights, the CRC recommends that non-citizenship ownership should be limited to lease land for a period not exceeding 25 years and subject to approval by the community and/or land owning families.

According to him, well over 30 old land laws are to be repealed by parliament in order to engender more fairness and equity in the ownership and use of land in the country, adding that there is a recommendation which sprouts from the National Land Policy for the establishment of a National Land Commission.

Delivering the keynote address, the German Ambassador to Sierra Leone Ambassador Wolfgang Wiethoff echoed that the people and Government of Sierra Leone own the land reform process and therefore bear the responsibility of determining which trajectory it should take.

Ambassador Wolfgang Wiethoff reiterated the fact that vast majority of the people depend on land for livelihood, mainly through agriculture. This he pointed out is as a result of the fact that other sectors have not been able to provide adequate employment opportunities.

As the reform process progresses, he said all stakeholders should ask the following question along the way: Are there adequate laws? Are the laws too old? Do the laws treat everybody equally? Are policies and laws fully implemented? Is there the political will?

He went further to say that land management and use should be within the context of poverty alleviation, food security, creating job opportunities and engendering national economic development, adding that Sierra Leone has the potential to produce enough food for the open market and for export.

The role of civil society organizations and the media, Ambassador Wolfgang Wiethoff maintained, is as important as the success of the reforms hoped for.
He congratulated Culture Radio and Green Scenery for organizing the conference, concluding that the role of the German diplomatic team is to observe and provide support for the land reform process.

Presenting an overview on international land deals in the country, the Programs Manager of the Sierra Leone Network on the Right to Food (SiLNoRF), Abass J. Kamara, said since 2007, there has been rapid large-scale land takeover from poor and vulnerable people mostly farmers by big mining companies and multinational companies operating in the agricultural sector.

He said the widely accepted view that Sierra Leone has abundant arable land has been contradicted by empirical research which states that there is already pressure for arable land in the country.

Mr. Kamara added that land deals such as those struck by Sierra Leone China Agricultural Development Company, Socfin Agriculture, African Land Limited and the defunct ADDAX Bioenergy, are appalling and unrepresentative of the people’s interest.

The consequences of bad land deals he went on, include destruction of livelihoods, increased potential for conflict and other social problems.
On the current status of legal reform process, Lawyer Sonkita Conteh, head of the legal aid group NAMATI emphasized the need for mass awareness raising around land related issues.

He said most people do not have access to information, do not know what they have, what their rights are and how they can defend these rights. NAMATI, he said, provides assistance in this regard. He disclosed that the act whereby government sets prices for community and family land is illegal and also withholding 50% from land sale proceeds by government is blatant thievery.

Lawyer Sonkita Conteh referred to the new National Land Policy as a good policy and that its full implementation is the next important step for stakeholders. He emphasized the need to transform the policy into law for it to have full legal effect. The question as to whether the laws would be codified into one law or several still lingers, he stressed.

On experiences from Sahn Malen, an affected community in Pujehun, former Member of Parliament Shiaka Musa Sama who happens to be the spokesman of the Malen Affected Land Owners Association (MALOA) said there is constant harassment and intimidation of MALOA members, a civil society organization formed to articulate and defend the rights of land owning families.

On the way forward, he said government must set up among other things, an independent body to investigate the issue and pay commensurate compensation to people who have lost their lands.

Madam Maria Teresa Perez Rocha from the World Rainforest Movement (WRM) in Uruguay, delivering a presentation, said her organization provides support to communities that grapple with the challenge of defending their territories and forests against multinational companies.

She said WRM, since its establishment, has provided support to communities affected by large-scale industrial tree plantations in Latin America, Asia and Africa, adding that large scale industrial tree plantations often create severe problems and conflicts for local communities.

Awareness raising and media engagement, she noted, have exposed bad companies and this has had serious repercussion on their finances.

Also making presentations at the conference where Joseph Rahall of Green Scenery, Christian Schultz of the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) who spoke about the importance of the VGGT in protecting land rights and Peter Pijpers representing Natural Habitat, one of the multinational companies operating in the country. 

Despite being critical of him, conference participants praised the Natural Habitat manager for honouring the invitation to deliver a statement regarding the operation of the company and its impact on communities affected by its work. This is so because multinational companies hardly attend such events. 

The conference ended with the formulation of a National Advocacy Strategy and a National Media Strategy, as well as a communiqué demanding for positive changes in the country’s land governance system.

Special guests at the conference were Marion Aberle, Head International Advocacy Team of Welt Hunger Hilfe in Germany, Caroline Kruckow and Andrea Mueller from Bread for the World in Germany and Maria Teresa Perez Rocha from the World Rainforest Movement in Uruguay. 

My View



I Rest My Case!!!!
Had Nelson Williams Been Killed
With Theophilus Sahr Gbenda
No doubt, Retired Major General Alfred Claude Nelson Williams, former Chief of Defence Staff of the Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces (RSLAF) and now Deputy High Commissioner of Sierra Leone to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, was close to death following his recent capture and eventual release by a criminal gang in Kaduna, Nigeria.
How he got kidnapped has not been fully explained to us. Maybe there’s something to hide. What we all know however is that he was kidnapped and put on ’sale’ for the sum of $150,000. We also now know that he could not have been released had the ’purchase’ prize not fully and timely delivered.
This is a sweet business indeed that’s worthy a try. Imagine two or three young jobless guys just wake up in the morning and carelessly decide to get hold of a dignitary and then conveniently peg a price as condition for that dignitary to be released. This is unbelievable. I’ll love to try it if I have my way.
This is where Nelson Williams’ case differs. His kidnapping was a talk of town. Apart from the wide media coverage it attracted both locally and internationally, everybody’s ears were on the ground waiting for whatever news, good or bad, that comes out of his dilemma.
As uncertain as the situation was, people started coming up with quite ridiculous suggestions and some even issuing threats of reprisal should he be killed. One suggestion was that let the kidnappers don’t worry, they will deliver into their hands 20 parliamentarians from the ruling party and five ministers including Information Minister Mohamed Bangura, Foreign Affairs Minister Samura Kamara, Transport and Aviation Balogun Koroma and Resident Minister East Karamoh Kabba, while the kidnappers in turn handover to them the ransom for Nelson Williams.
Social media went viral on the issue throughout the duration of the kidnap episode, with views freely expressed by so many schools of thought.
It was obvious that the government had no clue whatsoever as to how to handle the situation. Little wonder why it relied entirely on the Government of Nigeria to take care. This is the reason why our government is tight lipped on the issue of ransom, as to whether it was paid or not. Speculations are even flying around that Retired Major General Nelson Williams escaped from captivity. Such speculations would not have arisen had the government been plain with the actual fact of the matter. A government spokesperson in a media interview on the issue stated categorically that no ransom was paid at all.
What is clear in this regard is that the ransom demanded by the gang was duly paid by the Nigerian Government through a licensed agent.
The question is how Mr. Williams could have regained his freedom without the %100 cooperation of the criminal gang that held him hostage for over 72 hours. The fact that the kidnap episode ended after the resurfacing of the captive is an indication of an amicable settlement.
The critical issue to thoroughly examine is how comes Mr. Williams was targeted. Could it have been by mere coincidence or something intentionally intentional? So many stories are coming up in this light, with some suggesting that it could have been a big deal and that Nelson himself could have been an accomplice.
Whatever it is, the good thing is that Nelson is back alive. Supposed he had been killed is a question lingering.
Assuredly, it would have had severe implications had he been killed. One obvious implication could have been a sour diplomatic relation between us and Nigerians as citizens and also between Sierra Leone and Nigeria as sovereignty states under international obligation to provide adequate security for host diplomats.
It may have even led to the closure of the Nigerian Embassy here by means of force and the likely targeting of Nigerians resident here and their numerous businesses.
It could have also put the safety of our Sierra Leonean compatriots resident in Nigeria in total jeopardy.
For all these clear implications, blame should be apportioned somewhere if only to avert what in many ways is an offshoot of an outright blunder.
In my humble opinion, the blame should go directly to Major General Retired Alfred Claude Nelson Williams.
As a highly placed security conscious personnel, it goes without saying that he acted rather recklessly to have ventured into a dangerous zone such as Kaduna where he was eventually kidnapped. In other words, he ought to have known better.
Imagine a one-time general and head of a whole army in the hands of armatures. This is quite a shame to himself, the RSLAF and the country as a whole.
This is a good reason why he should not go unpunished. If anything, he should undergo vigorous questioning.
It’s not enough to just blindly celebrate his release and then forget wholesomely about the implications his carelessness would have plunged the country and its citizenry into.
One thing we must not forget to take cognizance of is the capacity of our foreign embassies in terms of financial capacity and logistics.
Was it that Mr. Williams risked going by road because there was no provision for an alternative means to get to Kaduna? Going by aircraft no doubt was the best option giving the security implications.
Capacity or no capacity, Mr. Nelson Williams had the ultimate responsibility of determining whether going by road was safe enough for him to even put his life and those traveling with him including his driver at great risk.
Imagine his vehicle had been bombed by Boko Haram which is very much active in the area and then massacred in the process. This is nothing short of lack of due diligence in diplomatic protocols in relation to safety, travel time and the risk factor.
I rest my case!!!


I Rest My Case!!!!
Had Nelson Williams Been Killed
With Theophilus Sahr Gbenda
No doubt, Retired Major General Alfred Claude Nelson Williams, former Chief of Defence Staff of the Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces (RSLAF) and now Deputy High Commissioner of Sierra Leone to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, was close to death following his recent capture and eventual release by a criminal gang in Kaduna, Nigeria.
How he got kidnapped has not been fully explained to us. Maybe there’s something to hide. What we all know however is that he was kidnapped and put on ’sale’ for the sum of $150,000. We also now know that he could not have been released had the ’purchase’ prize not fully and timely delivered.
This is a sweet business indeed that’s worthy a try. Imagine two or three young jobless guys just wake up in the morning and carelessly decide to get hold of a dignitary and then conveniently peg a price as condition for that dignitary to be released. This is unbelievable. I’ll love to try it if I have my way.
This is where Nelson Williams’ case differs. His kidnapping was a talk of town. Apart from the wide media coverage it attracted both locally and internationally, everybody’s ears were on the ground waiting for whatever news, good or bad, that comes out of his dilemma.
As uncertain as the situation was, people started coming up with quite ridiculous suggestions and some even issuing threats of reprisal should he be killed. One suggestion was that let the kidnappers don’t worry, they will deliver into their hands 20 parliamentarians from the ruling party and five ministers including Information Minister Mohamed Bangura, Foreign Affairs Minister Samura Kamara, Transport and Aviation Balogun Koroma and Resident Minister East Karamoh Kabba, while the kidnappers in turn handover to them the ransom for Nelson Williams.
Social media went viral on the issue throughout the duration of the kidnap episode, with views freely expressed by so many schools of thought.
It was obvious that the government had no clue whatsoever as to how to handle the situation. Little wonder why it relied entirely on the Government of Nigeria to take care. This is the reason why our government is tight lipped on the issue of ransom, as to whether it was paid or not. Speculations are even flying around that Retired Major General Nelson Williams escaped from captivity. Such speculations would not have arisen had the government been plain with the actual fact of the matter. A government spokesperson in a media interview on the issue stated categorically that no ransom was paid at all.
What is clear in this regard is that the ransom demanded by the gang was duly paid by the Nigerian Government through a licensed agent.
The question is how Mr. Williams could have regained his freedom without the %100 cooperation of the criminal gang that held him hostage for over 72 hours. The fact that the kidnap episode ended after the resurfacing of the captive is an indication of an amicable settlement.
The critical issue to thoroughly examine is how comes Mr. Williams was targeted. Could it have been by mere coincidence or something intentionally intentional? So many stories are coming up in this light, with some suggesting that it could have been a big deal and that Nelson himself could have been an accomplice.
Whatever it is, the good thing is that Nelson is back alive. Supposed he had been killed is a question lingering.
Assuredly, it would have had severe implications had he been killed. One obvious implication could have been a sour diplomatic relation between us and Nigerians as citizens and also between Sierra Leone and Nigeria as sovereignty states under international obligation to provide adequate security for host diplomats.
It may have even led to the closure of the Nigerian Embassy here by means of force and the likely targeting of Nigerians resident here and their numerous businesses.
It could have also put the safety of our Sierra Leonean compatriots resident in Nigeria in total jeopardy.
For all these clear implications, blame should be apportioned somewhere if only to avert what in many ways is an offshoot of an outright blunder.
In my humble opinion, the blame should go directly to Major General Retired Alfred Claude Nelson Williams.
As a highly placed security conscious personnel, it goes without saying that he acted rather recklessly to have ventured into a dangerous zone such as Kaduna where he was eventually kidnapped. In other words, he ought to have known better.
Imagine a one-time general and head of a whole army in the hands of armatures. This is quite a shame to himself, the RSLAF and the country as a whole.
This is a good reason why he should not go unpunished. If anything, he should undergo vigorous questioning.
It’s not enough to just blindly celebrate his release and then forget wholesomely about the implications his carelessness would have plunged the country and its citizenry into.
One thing we must not forget to take cognizance of is the capacity of our foreign embassies in terms of financial capacity and logistics.
Was it that Mr. Williams risked going by road because there was no provision for an alternative means to get to Kaduna? Going by aircraft no doubt was the best option giving the security implications.
Capacity or no capacity, Mr. Nelson Williams had the ultimate responsibility of determining whether going by road was safe enough for him to even put his life and those traveling with him including his driver at great risk.
Imagine his vehicle had been bombed by Boko Haram which is very much active in the area and then massacred in the process. This is nothing short of lack of due diligence in diplomatic protocols in relation to safety, travel time and the risk factor.
I rest my case!!!